leadtools ocr c# example

best ocr library c#

abbyy ocr c#

c# ocr pdf file

c# tesseract ocr pdf example

c# ocr image to text free,
zonal ocr c#,
c# zonal ocr,
emgu ocr c# example,

emgu ocr c# example,
c# tesseract ocr download,
c# read ocr pdf,
onenote ocr in c#,
c# ocr pdf open source,
open source ocr library c#,
c# free ocr library,
c# ocr pdf file,

ocr c#,
microsoft.windows.ocr c# sample,
c sharp ocr library,
c# ocr pdf,
c# zonal ocr,
ocr github c#,
ocr c#,
how to implement ocr in c#,
c# ocr freeware,
c# ocr example,
c# ocr pdf file,
c# zonal ocr,
tesseract ocr api c#,
c# ocr nuget,
c# ocr library free,
ocr library c#,
tesseract ocr c# wrapper,
tesseract ocr pdf c#,

how to implement ocr in c#,
c# ocr tool,
tesseract ocr api c#,
c# ocr api open source,
c# tesseract ocr tiff,
ocr api c#,
emgu cv ocr c# example,
ocr sdk c# free,
computer vision api ocr c#,
best ocr api c#,
ocr library c# free,
free ocr api for c#,
tesseract 3 ocr c# example,
abbyy ocr c#,
open source ocr api c#,
c# winforms ocr,
c# ocr pdf file,
tesseract ocr c# image to text,
asprise-ocr-api c# example,
c# windows form ocr,
c# ocr github,
c# ocr barcode open source,
abbyy ocr sdk c#,
c# ocr tesseract,
c# ocr example,
read text from image c# without ocr,
tesseract ocr c# wrapper,
c# ocr pdf image,
aspose ocr c# example,
ocr sdk c#,
free ocr sdk in c#.net,
ocr c#,
ocr sdk open source c#,
c# ocr tesseract,
how to implement ocr in c#,
c# pdf ocr,
c# ocr pdf,
c# tesseract ocr example,
c# ocr example,
abbyy ocr sdk c#,
asprise ocr c#,
leadtools ocr c# example,
c# tesseract ocr pdf example,
tesseract ocr pdf to text c#,
open source ocr library c#,
ocr machine learning c#,
c# ocr pdf image,
c# ocr modi,
microsoft.windows.ocr c# sample,

Let s analyze the formatted output created by TKPROF Listing 19-12 shows the parts of the TKPROF output showing the parse, execute, and fetch counts Listing 19-12 The Parse, Execute, and Fetch Counts SQL> select elast_name,efirst_name,ddepartment_name from teste e,testd d where edepartment_id=ddepartment_id; call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ ------ ---------- -- ---------- ---------- -------Parse 1 000 000 0 0 0 0 Execute 1 000 000 0 0 0 0 Fetch 17322 182 185 3 136 5 259806 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------total 17324 182 185 3 136 5 259806 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE Parsing user id: 53 In Listing 19-12 CPU stands for total CPU time in seconds Elapsed is the total time elapsed in seconds Disk denotes total physical reads.

Query is the number of consistent buffer gets Current is the number of database block gets Rows is the total number of rows processed for each type of call From Listing 19-12, you can draw the following conclusions: The SQL statement shown previously was parsed once, so a parsed version wasn t available in the shared pool before execution The Parse column shows that this operation took less than 001 seconds Note that the lack of disk I/Os and buffer gets indicates that there were no data dictionary cache misses during the parse operation If the Parse column showed a large number for the same statement, it would be an indicator that bind variables weren t being used The statement was executed once and execution took less than 001 seconds Again, there were no disk I/Os or buffer gets during the execution phase.

It took me a lot longer than 001 seconds to get the results of the SELECT statement back The Fetch column answers this question of why that should be: it shows that the operation was performed 17,324 times and took up 182 seconds of CPU time The Fetch operation was performed 17,324 times and fetched 259,806 rows Because the number of rows is far greater than the number of fetches, you can deduce that Oracle used array fetch operations There were three physical reads during the fetch operation If there s a large difference between CPU time and elapsed time, it can be attributed to time taken up by disk reads In this case, the physical I/O has a value of only 3, and it matches the insignificant gap between CPU time and elapsed time.

Invoke Handler()

The fetch required 136 buffer gets in the consistent mode and only 5 DB block gets The CBO was being used, because the optimizer goal is shown as CHOOSE..

The following output shows the execution plan that was explicitly requested when TKPROF was invoked. Note that instead of the cost estimates that you get when you use the EXPLAIN PLAN tool, you get the number of rows output by each step of the execution. Rows ------259806 1161 1161 259806 Row Source Operation ----------------------MERGE JOIN SORT JOIN TABLE ACCESS FULL TESTD SORT JOIN

Create()

Finally, TKPROF summarizes the report, stating how many SQL statements were traced. Here s the summary portion of the TKPROF-formatted output: Trace file: ORA02344.TRC Trace file compatibility: 9.00.01 Sort options: default 2 sessions in trace file. 18 user SQL statements in trace file. 104 internal SQL statements in trace file. 72 SQL statements in trace file. 33 unique SQL statements in trace file. 18182 lines in trace file. The TKPROF output makes it easy to identify inefficient SQL statements. TKPROF can order the SQL statements by elapsed time (time taken for execution), which tells you which of the SQL statements you should focus on for optimization. The SQL Trace utility is a powerful tool in tuning SQL, because it goes far beyond the information produced by using EXPLAIN PLAN. It provides you with hard information about the number of the various types of calls made to Oracle during statement execution, and how the resource use was allocated to the various stages of execution.

Note It s easy to trace individual user sessions using the OEM Database Control. I explain how you can trace and view user sessions using the Database Control in the section Using the Database Control for End-to-End Tracing. You can trace a session as well as read the output file directly from the Database Control.